News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994). Parent comment

Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994) by arethuza on Friday September 04, 2020 @08:29AM (#24374328)
I remember getting new Sun workstations at that time and part of the fun of getting new Suns was taking the boxes of printed documentation that came with them and slotting them into the supplied ring folders.

Later on they would ship the Adobe red/blue/green PostScript books with OpenWindows.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994) by rswail on Friday September 04, 2020 @08:59AM (#24374495)
A full set of Vax documentation was at least the size of the Vax. I still have my 3 volume copy of HPUX's man page.

Including the famous bug for tunefs which is still current in FreeBSD (talk about slack in addressing the real issues!):

"You can tune a file system, but you cannot tune a fish."

https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=tunefs&sektion=8#e...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994) by PaulDavisThe1st on Friday September 04, 2020 @12:27PM (#24376408)
The docset was large, but it was not as large as a VAX.

I had to learn VMS in a hurry in the last two months of 1986. I had the full binder set on a shelf in my toilet (Cambridge, UK). You could not have put a VAX in there :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994) by a1369209993 on Friday September 04, 2020 @07:40PM (#24380043)
> "You can tune a file system, but you cannot tune a fish."

Well of course not; that would be "tunefsh", which no one has gotten around to writing.

[ Parent | on HN ]