News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Odyssey – Alexander Pope translation (1725) by veridies on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @11:02AM (#24353931)
> IANALC (I am not a literary critic)

Yeah, and neither am I, although I do have a BA in literature from a third-tier college, which probably doesn't give me much credibility here. Your opinion is pretty close to my own. The only thing I might disagree with you on is that I'm not as attached to the (mildly) archaic language. I think modern English can serve a mythic function; it just doesn't really work for me in Wilson's translation. By the way, if anyone wants to compare, here are three versions of that one line:

Pope

> Wandering from clime to clime, observant stray’d, Their manners noted, and their states survey’d.

Fagles

> Many cities of men he saw and learned their minds

Wilson

> and where he went, and who he met

(On this one, Pope is my favorite too.)

That being said: this is all literature! It's mostly a matter of taste and opinion. And if Wilson's writing helps anyone get something new out of the Odyssey, I'm all for it. I'm genuinely just curious what that is.

Re:The Odyssey – Alexander Pope translation (1725) by kijin on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @11:13AM (#24354024)
Yep, it can be a matter of taste and opinion. Wilson is certainly more accessible, and has a lower chance of making a high school student hate literature for life. :)

But when so much detail is lost, one begins to wonder if it should be called an "abridged edition", even if it preserves the number of lines.

Re:The Odyssey – Alexander Pope translation (1725) by adamsea on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:01PM (#24367487)
Yeah I didn’t get the impression that anything here is abridged.

There’s a big difference between that and a translators work for something like The Odyssey.