News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by aphextron on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @04:23PM (#24346606)
>parasocial relationships have a long and sordid history -- starting with the invention of the "fireside chat" on radio.

They don't call it the oldest profession as a joke. Social interaction and validation is the single most valuable thing to human beings, and it always has been. The basic business model of OnlyFans is absolutely no different than what has occured since the beginning of human civilization.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by hnick on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @08:29PM (#24348754)
Yeah I rarely watch Twitch but basically do so for two reasons.

The first is to check out games I'm interested in. The streamer is mostly incidental unless they're actually getting in the way of seeing the game. YouTube exists for this too, but I find the spaces in between the highlights that you see in streams to be more interesting than the structured reviews.

The second is to watch them play a game I've already played, usually in the hopes they enjoy it too. It's a form of validation of my own experiences, it's just nice to see someone happy at the same things I guess, and also a way to relive a story I might have mostly forgotten but through a fresh perspective.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by chii on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @01:35AM (#24350273)
> Yeah I rarely watch Twitch but basically do so for two reasons.

I think you may even be in the minority. I would expect most fans of twitch streamers to be an actual fan, not there to merely enjoy the game (even tho the game is actually enjoyable to them as well).

On youtube, it is more likely the opposite - "fans" on youtube enjoy the content, more than the youtuber. This is typically why once a youtuber becomes well-known for one type of content, that they cannot switch away (see the countless minecraft content creators that are somewhat burnt out by minecraft, but continues to make it since it is the majority of their views). Content creators who _are_ personalities and can branch out, have already done so to twitch.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by moksly on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @02:46AM (#24350654)
I think it’s hard to outline why people watch twitch. I follow quite a few blood bowl streamers, and use twitch for little else.

I use it like I use sports. Though at first I did learn things, but now it’s solely for watching high end playoff/championship games, sometimes with friends.

I haven’t really donated much outside the thing you get by having an amazon prime subscription. Which is honestly rather silly considering how much money I pay for my NFL subscription.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by Cthulhu_ on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @04:30AM (#24351181)
> It's a form of validation of my own experiences,

I think this is an important one. Growing up as kids, we'd often sit next to siblings (or parents) to watch them play games, turning them into a shared experience.

I prefer watching shit on TV with my girlfriend over watching it alone as well; like you said, having someone else react similarly validates your experience.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by dwighttk on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @10:29PM (#24349448)
Man I barely even want to watch the cut scenes once.
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by andromeduck on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @06:02PM (#24347653)
It's really not to different from a lot of religious behavior either. If people can feel deeply attached after reading a book or hearing a story It really shouldn't be surprising that that others can feel the same via stream or other digital mediums. One can also think of these purchased rewards/interactions as the equivalent of relic collection/worship.
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by mattmanser on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @06:48PM (#24348040)
I'd hesitate to conflate the two.

As someone from a mainly secular country, I have often pondered the loss of a central gathering place the places like a church give to society.

A weekly service really helps foster a community. The only other thing that does is schools, but that excludes a huge swathe of people.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by foxdev on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @07:16PM (#24348237)
You might be interested in the concept of the third place: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_place
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by abeppu on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @07:34PM (#24348363)
Bwahahahasob. That's right, in the before-times home and work were separate places.
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by TeMPOraL on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @04:14AM (#24351110)
Only in last couple centuries; before, when most people lived in villages, your home was your workplace.
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by mensetmanusman on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @11:00AM (#24353916)
It is very interesting, especially the sociological demographic data showing what is happening in response to the decline of church attendance.

In a nut-shell, communities that stop going to ‘church’ don’t produce enough offspring to be long term (centuries) stable, but those that do are long term stable.

Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by tenacious_tuna on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @12:29PM (#24354839)
That's fascinating! I've wondered about that anecdotally for some time. Do you have links to more in-depth reading?
Re:Bella Thorne, OnlyFans and the battle over monetising con... by mensetmanusman on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @05:03PM (#24358113)