News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by myself248 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:27PM (#24297628)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinorwig_Power_Station

...can supply a maximum power of 1,728-megawatt and has a storage capacity of around 9.1 GWh.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by oblio on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:33PM (#24297692)
I've just checked and Germany produced 516TWh of electricity in 2019. So that would mean that you need how many? 50000+ of these?
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by myself248 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:29PM (#24298283)
Lazy troll is lazy. You don't need to store your entirely yearly production. You need to store the difference between your daily production peak and your daily demand peak, and you only need to store it for that fraction of the day.

Try harder, please.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by Someone on Thursday August 27, 2020 @06:17PM (#24299308)
“You need to store the difference between your daily production peak and your daily demand peak”

Firstly, I would think the difference between production and demand on a single day is a better indicator than the difference between your daily production peak and your daily demand peak, which could be months away from the day production peaks.

Even that isn’t correct, though. Such a reserve buffer would be depleted after that worst-case day, so if the day after that day also has demand outstrip production, you’re in trouble.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by imtringued on Friday August 28, 2020 @07:03AM (#24303480)
You know, we have these things called gas plants... They burn gas and you can turn them off if you don't need them... You can even generate the gas with excess renewables if you really want to...
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by shuntress on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:49PM (#24297848)
If your goal is to store 100% of all power produced for an entire year for use a later date, then yeah... you would need 50,000+ of those.

If your goal is something not ridiculous, for example, storing storing the difference of production-consumption when production>consumption for use later when consumption>production, you would likely need very significantly less than 50,000+ of those.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by oblio on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:22PM (#24298197)
My point is that these need very specific conditions to actually work and you need a lot of them.

For your average country even having 100 is difficult. Think of some flat place like Poland.

More than that, Germany isn't even the biggest producer/consumer of electricity... Imagine some place like China trying to ramp this up.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by grey-area on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:39PM (#24297743)
No.

Clearly you only need a small proportion of grid power in storage to cope with peaks.

There are also multiple ways to smooth load - overcapacity, battery storage, pumped storage, load shedding, pricing. These are solved problems which just need a bit more work and investment, and many countries already use pumped storage extensively.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by oblio on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:48PM (#24297845)
The only example that I know of is Norway which is kind of the holy grail of hydro, in general:

1. Small population.

2. Pretty tall mountains and sparsely populated mountains (see 1.)

3. Quite high yearly rainfall levels.

4. Very rich country.

5. Country with a very low level of corruption and from what I know, pretty efficient at building new infrastructure.

Is there an example of an "average" country having decent levels of pumped hydro storage at a level that's above 0.5% of the country's needs?

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by grey-area on Friday August 28, 2020 @04:14AM (#24302523)
The UK has had pumped storage since 1963, there are more planned around the world - this is neither exotic nor particularly hard, the only constraint is land, and as I mentioned there are multiple other solutions.

Scotland has already entirely met its needs with renewables this year. This can and will be expanded to other nations in time.

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by myself248 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:28PM (#24298260)
Oh, just a few oddballs nobody's ever heard of: Switzerland, Austria, Portugal, Japan, Spain, Italy, South Africa, Belgium, Ukraine, South Korea, Poland, France, Australia, Thailand, Germany, UK, India, US, China, Russia.

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricit...

Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern... by coryrc on Thursday August 27, 2020 @05:36PM (#24298973)
That's power, not energy.