Re:Epic vs. Apple: Order Granting in Part and Denying in Par...
by rimliu on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @04:50AM
(#24269352)
How is that being forced on everyone? E. g. I do not use Steam, so they can do whatever they want, it would have zero effect on me.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Epic vs. Apple: Order Granting in Part and Denying in Par...
by hnick on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @09:32PM
(#24278146)
The action that triggered these events is that Epic chose to sell some items at a higher price via the Apple store to cover the 30% "tax" and make it clearer to consumers that they are paying a premium to the middleman, or at a lower price via in-game currency (which could be purchased elsewhere) directly in the game.
Offering this consumer choice is what lead to Fortnite being banned.
Re:Epic vs. Apple: Order Granting in Part and Denying in Par...
by StavrosK on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @08:15AM
(#24270531)
Steam isn't manufacturing computers. This is about Apple the computer manufacturer. It's unfair for them to lock their computers/phones down so people can't install software without Apple's permission.
The App Store is more or less a red herring here (relevant only to the 30% fee being too much).
Re:Epic vs. Apple: Order Granting in Part and Denying in Par...
by OnlyForF1 on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @11:26PM
(#24278797)
Is it though? There's no legal precedent that would allow for software vendors to force device manufacturers to allow their software to be run on the manufacturer's hardware. Otherwise we'd see Android on iPhones, legally-mandated Facebook integration on everything, custom car firmware etc.