This meets most of the criteria you see the "strong towns" people plugging for. Walkable streets. Convenient retail. Few cars. Very low speeds. Excellent land utilization. No space wasted on parking. Affordable.
Of course, the people who write those articles wouldn't live in a place like that themselves.
[1] https://earth.google.com/web/search/@22.54024647,114.0656082...
> Of course, the people who write those articles wouldn't live in a place like that themselves.
This is like suggesting that people who value having their own backyard are being inconsistent by not moving into the remote countryside. There's nothing inconsistent in promoting a certain set of values within desiring those values taken to the extreme.
Last year we visited the Anata no Warehouse arcade in Kawasski, which had parts modeled after it. Unfortunatelly it closed at the end of November 2019: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/anata-no-warehouse
“ These towers would contain new dwelling space—light-filled apartments of twelve-hundred square feet, each equipped with a balcony and parking spot”
Where does your assessment come from?
Yes, you can have a hollow center with interior balconies. It's been tried. It fails for residential.
Most buildings in Budapest are set up this way and I don't see how it fails. Technically they are hallways, not balconies, but they function the same way.
I honestly hated this design because the hollow center was almost never getting any light, but it was getting the moist and the rain, making it look dirty almost all the time. It also act has a good way for sound to propagate. You can hear your neighbours at all time ...
When the hollow center has the size of a court, it is okay, but when it is just a few meters wide, it is truly awful.