Plumbers have it mostly sorted out though. Critical tech might demand higher pay but I love this story I read of a band doing a wedding and negotiating pay for a 4 hour reception. The planner and band can't come to an agreement so the band says to call the local plumbers union, ask what the cost is for 4 guys on a 4 hours job, and use that number with some drinks tossed in.
Not that I think any of this is bad since the NFL is brutal to its lowest earners, but it absolutely hurts the highest earners.
Some people experience less optimal outcomes in a union. Those people are free to resist unionization. What I don't like is the claim that, because some specific high performers can no longer negotiate as well, everybody else should shut up about unionization.
But the screenwriters guild is another example if you don't want to look for one where top performers are paid eight figure salaries.
Huh? Sure they do. The MLB negotiated agreement is terrible for top performers, who are paid close to the league minimum salary for the first three years of their career, and an arbitration-determined salary for the next two.
As soon as the union-negotiated common salary time runs out, top players’ pay jumps several times.
> As soon as the union-negotiated common salary time runs out, top players’ pay jumps several times.
That 'several times' level only exists because of the unions.
I get your point and it's a good one, I just think when we're talking about literally 100-200 people negotiating 8 and 9-figure yearly contracts it's an outlier (to say the least).
Or it negotiates yearly raise brackets.
You can negotiate better individually if you are good and there arent union enforced guidelines, if you're not, the union deal would work out better.
No wonder if US unions always end up so bad if apparently nobody is willing to fix things and let pancilpushers do it.
Unions don't really work for software, high demand, low supply of people, here you can negotiate better then without one, and if you are not happy, next job.
You can join the union or not. If you don't join you can still take advantage of the union negotiated rates or not if you wish. If you think you can negotiate better than the union you're still free to do so.
Do you know if you earn more than your colleagues? If so, is this because of your negotiating skills?
It is due to demand and offer for my technical skills... I switch or ask for a raise if I get a better offer, anyone can/should do that.
It's not due to unions. Here unions are mandatory and result is what I said earlier, that plus making it hard to fire incompetent people.
That's potentially quite an expensive trade-off. You give up your ability to negotiate so that somebody else will collectively negotiate on your behalf.
That can work out well, at least for a while, but it's worth considering the longer-term consequences. E.g., in the longer term it can favour cheaper labour or cheaper competitors elsewhere. (Yes, you can argue that's the case even in the absence of unions, but there are stark examples of unionisation bringing about the premature demise or severe shrinkage of large industries: steel in the UK, the auto industry particularly in the UK (and also, to some extent, the US), coal in the UK, and the list goes on.)
For me outsourcing your negotiating power falls into a similar category to outsourcing your thinking: it simply doesn't feel like a good idea to me.