News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Modeling a Wealth Tax by TheOtherHobbes on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @05:57PM (#24204828)
We should also work out the costs of not having good cheap public healthcare, education, infrastructure - and not also having public access to the best R&D talent because it's working to make billionaires even richer through clever rent-extraction strategies from the markets.

And so on.

All of these negatives cost money. Aside from the humanitarian considerations - not trivial - they're a huge drag on social mobility, innovation, and business opportunity.

The fact that some people feel irrationally inconvenienced by the prospect of extra taxes - which in reality will not materially affect them or their opportunities in any significant way - is an unconvincing reason to ignore the staggering social, economic, and political costs of their uniquely privileged position.

Re:Modeling a Wealth Tax by agensaequivocum on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @08:14PM (#24205832)
> The fact that some people feel irrationally inconvenienced by the prospect of extra taxes - which in reality will not materially affect them

Perhaps it's because we oppose them in principle.

Re:Modeling a Wealth Tax by abiogenesis on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @09:33PM (#24206296)
If you are accepting that the statements (1) "[wealth tax] in reality will not materially affect them", and (2) "[status quo is] a huge drag on social mobility, innovation, and business opportunity" are correct; opposing them in principle is not rational.