Re:Amazon satellites add to astronomers' worries about night...
by scroogeydop on Friday August 14, 2020 @02:34AM
(#24154465)
Time to start building tools to jam the spectrum. Make these things useless.
Re:Amazon satellites add to astronomers' worries about night...
by jsilence on Friday August 14, 2020 @03:05AM
(#24154717)
So that we'll have the negative impact of the satelites, but no benefit? How is that supposed to solve anything?
Re:Amazon satellites add to astronomers' worries about night...
by silon42 on Friday August 14, 2020 @03:35AM
(#24154962)
Eventually they will deorbit.
Re:Amazon satellites add to astronomers' worries about night...
by scroogeydop on Friday August 14, 2020 @04:55PM
(#24163154)
The goal is to hurt the business model. Make people think the service is unreliable and they won’t use it.
Re:Amazon satellites add to astronomers' worries about night...
by Google234 on Friday August 14, 2020 @07:57AM
(#24156717)
This is very illegal.
Re:Amazon satellites add to astronomers' worries about night...
by alsdkfjkqjwer on Friday August 14, 2020 @12:05PM
(#24159691)
they will use k-a for admin traffic and k-u for user data, same as one of the 5G types, which I believe is non-regulated.
So, i guess it is as legal as the interference themselves will cause on your 5g phone reception.
And since when has "It's difficult" been a free pass? Both of those companies beat their chests about how neat their tech is, but when it comes to a genuinely hard problem - as in, how to launch this fleet without fucking up humankind's ability to gaze into the cosmos as we have for our entire history - you're going to let them duck it?
And, to head off the obvious objection: I really, genuinely, truly don't care how difficult it is, why the physics make it difficult, what a vacuum does for heat, etc. I know. It's a hard problem. Maybe you don't get to launch fifty thousand satellites into orbit without solving it.