If I owned a grocery store chain, and some food company decided to trash me in the press, mock me, and sue me, I would never allow a single one of their products on my store's shelves again, forever, regardless of the outcome. I honestly don't understand what Epic hopes to achieve here. Why wouldn't Apple just ban Epic products from their store for good after this?
Apple isn’t the store owner, they are the shelf manufacturer. We are the store owners, and Apple is telling us what we’re allowed to put on our shelves. You know, I don’t think this is a great metaphorical framework.
They're not asking for money, they're just asking for an order ordering Apple to stop their anti-competitive behavior with the app store and with payments. No cleaners are likely to be involved in this process win or lose.
The only meaning I'm aware of is "to take tons of money from", what's the other?
-- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/take+to+the+cleaners
1. Fighting it out in court, and then paying damages is probably going to be cheaper than 18 billion USD.
2. I don’t know if AppStore profits (NPV of discounted future profits) make it even worth 18 billion USD.
3. If they buy out Epic, they’re signaling weakness which is basically asking the next company to play the same game.
4. It just provides more evidence & impetus for those pushing for antitrust action.
There is technically a chance Apple might eventually acquire Epic, but if so, that would be driven by Apple seeking an interesting platform for its VR hardware, not to just close down this lawsuit.
Now Epic is worth over $18b, has some VERY big name investors, and controls the most popular game on the planet. They have the power to sway public sentiment against Apple, a legal leg to stand on as far as anti-trust, deep pockets, and powerful friends.
My guess, and hope, is that Epic takes Apple to the cleaners.