Re:Street View of 1940s New York
by neom on Thursday August 13, 2020 @10:37PM
(#24152587)
Property developers have to buy up the section of a block to demo(lish) and build something worthwhile. Many of the buildings are individually/family owned, with little incentive to change/think about change or some pride in passing the building down generationally. If you have an annuity (rents) sitting on top of appreciating land value and you're old or a son/daughter (usually living elsewhere collecting a rent cheque), why bother/how can you convince your neighbors to as well? That's why the section around Ainslie and Union I mentioned was able to be converted, they're all business/warehouses, a condo there now was in the 1940 picture an auto repair garage with the same footprint as the condo, but the house next to it still stands as is.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Is "demo" for "demolish" common usage?
EDIT: non-native speaker trying to improve my English by asking questions about English used in the wild; not trying to be judgemental
Very common in the US and Canada but probably not outside (updated my comment).
Common in New Zealand.
Not in the UK. I'd be very confused by that usage. "Demo" means "demonstration" or "demonstrate". Maybe builders might use it that way but I've not ever heard it.
My friends in the trades have used the word fairly regularly. I'd say yes.
Native-born bi-coastal boomer American here. Never heard this usage until my house was remodeled and the general contractor used it. I had to stop him and ask what he meant. (I didn’t feel too stupid since the vowels and syllable stress are different.)