Re:Validating Kubernetes YAML for best practice and policies
by secondcoming on Sunday August 09, 2020 @12:16PM
(#24100605)
Not officially, but it's fakeable
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Validating Kubernetes YAML for best practice and policies
by pjmlp on Sunday August 09, 2020 @12:28PM
(#24100694)
Which for me is a design smell, why bother with workarounds when XML already offers me all the best tooling out of the box.
Re:Validating Kubernetes YAML for best practice and policies
by secondcoming on Sunday August 09, 2020 @09:23PM
(#24104554)
For me, xml is just too much, and when working with C or C++ (not t sure about rust) it's just a pain. Can your json schema file not serve as the documentation?
Re:Validating Kubernetes YAML for best practice and policies
by pjmlp on Monday August 10, 2020 @01:42AM
(#24105938)
Why should it be a pain? Parsing XML is no different than parsing JSON, there are plenty of robust parsers available since around 2000.
Mature libraries with plenty of experience deploying into production.
Plus for small enough stuff, like configuration files, one can just plug XPATH as well, making the search for items even easier.
Re:Validating Kubernetes YAML for best practice and policies
by jayd16 on Sunday August 09, 2020 @01:08PM
(#24101027)
If something like k8s implemented comments as specific comment fields that would actually be pretty useful. The fields could be parsed and show in GUIs.
Re:Validating Kubernetes YAML for best practice and policies
by secondcoming on Sunday August 09, 2020 @09:12PM
(#24104487)
That is the workaround, just add it as "comment":"comment text". Having one comment for each field in an object would get unwieldy though. Anther place for them is possibly in the json schema file.