News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo... by threatofrain on Sunday August 02, 2020 @10:20PM (#24033603)
Then say they’ve been corrupted and name the corrupt members so the discussion can continue past vague implication.
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo... by e_d_e_v on Sunday August 02, 2020 @11:21PM (#24033909)
If you are interested in the context and generally unfamiliar with the W3C, maybe these articles will help:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/07/amid-unprecedented-con...

https://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/w3c_sells_out_web_eme...

Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo... by fouc on Monday August 03, 2020 @06:02AM (#24035889)
I would prefer to err on the side of caution when looking at the actions of key strategic pieces of large corporations.

The burden of proof for not being corrupted lies with the people and organizations that wield tremendous power.

We can't just have blind faith and wait for proof of corruption first. Instead we should assume it, and look for proof that there isn't any and be thankful when that's the case.

Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo... by bryan_w on Monday August 03, 2020 @07:19PM (#24044661)
Normal folks: Keep the above post in mind next time you see an post thats overly cynical. This is the logic that the top minds of HN use to come to their viewpoints.