Re:Donald Trump Jr suspended from tweeting after Covid post
by elpool2 on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @03:00PM
(#23979437)
The video didn't just suggest that it might be an effective treatment, it claimed that hydroxychloroquine is a cure.
"This virus has a cure. It's called hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax. I know people want to talk about a mask. Hello. You don't need mask. There is a cure."
These "medical professionals" are quacks
Re:Donald Trump Jr suspended from tweeting after Covid post
by jandrese on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @03:31PM
(#23979737)
What? How can you not trust the person that runs https://archive.fo/G7wtb ?
Re:Donald Trump Jr suspended from tweeting after Covid post
by tw04 on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @04:08PM
(#23980106)
The way you're framing this is disingenuous at best. This isn't a disagreement between medical professionals. The person he linked to isn't some respected pathologist, it's a person I can only classify as borderline if not outright insane.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/stella-immanuel-trumps-new-cov...
Re:Donald Trump Jr suspended from tweeting after Covid post
by otterley on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @03:02PM
(#23979463)
> Should Twitter be the one to make that judgement call and block a video from medical professionals? No.
Why not? Their house, their rules.
Re:Donald Trump Jr suspended from tweeting after Covid post
by aeternum on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @04:52PM
(#23980576)
It can be their rules, but then they should not be able to advertise things like this:
"Free expression is a human right. Everyone has a voice, and the right to use it. On Twitter, you should feel safe expressing your unique point of view with every Tweet – and it’s our job to make that happen."
"Twitter stands for freedom of expression for everyone."
"We do not take sides. We show sides. Every side."
"We treat everyone equally: the same Twitter Rules apply to all."
"we allow strong opinions and controversial views."
Re:Donald Trump Jr suspended from tweeting after Covid post
by otterley on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @05:11PM
(#23980752)
I kind of agree with you, but also disagree somewhat. I think these statements are aspirational in that they reflect Twitter's general principles. But when the rubber hits the road, there are practical limits and exceptions that you make to preserve what you perceive as the greater good and to make sure that the potential harms that come with unrestrained freedom don't outweigh the benefits. I don't think Twitter wants their principles to constitute a suicide pact.
Is hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness questionable? Yes.
Should Twitter be the one to make that judgement call and block a video from medical professionals? No.
Can Twitter do this? Sadly, until Section 230 is reformed, Yes.