Not sure why you jumped to the conclusion that someone saying "X is not like playing a sport" is a claim that "sports are trivially easy compared to X". I don't think the parent comment was claiming that at all, just that they're different, namely that dance is not inherently competitive.
As someone who plays basketball and tennis, it takes a lot of focus to pay attention to my whole body for an entire practice session (vs. just a single part that I'm trying to improve). Most of the time, if I don't explicitly try to pay attention, I just use muscle memory and try to get into "the zone".
In tennis for example, I only need to pay maximal attention when learning a stroke (although of course it's beneficial to pay attention to every body part when just regularly playing - it's not necessary, and certainly something that a lot of recreational players don't do). Whereas with dance, it's required that you pay attention to your entire body for the entire practice session to memorize a choreography.
I think that's the difference that's important for this paper. If my elderly dad were to play basketball, he might rely on muscle memory. Whereas, if his nursing home taught dance classes, he would definitively have to pay attention to all of his body parts.
I want you to read this entire sentence, including the part after "except". I want you to tell me what you think that last clause means.
> It is not like playing a sport, except perhaps if you do it competitively
Do you think there is perhaps the slightest chance that they did not intend to say that "playing a sport does not require control of your entire body"?
Is there even a tiny possibility that they said that dancing non-competitively is not like playing a sport, perhaps because they are including competition in the definition of sport?
> Some people cant see their own bias I guess. :)
Agreed.
it == dancing && it != sport
dancing.entails(entire_body)
sport.entails(entire_body)
Clearer now?
Some people cant see their own bias I guess. :)