Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by guhidalg on Thursday July 23, 2020 @04:51PM
(#23932109)
I think it’s naive to think the X-37 doesn’t have the capability to be used a weapon. A spacecraft able to stay in orbit for years with the ability to hide its payload from observers we must assume is carrying something onboard that can be considered a weapon.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by cryptonector on Thursday July 23, 2020 @06:12PM
(#23933078)
It's overkill as an anti-sat sat. It'd be much cheaper to put up tons of anti-sat sats meant only for that purpose -- no need to reenter and land, no need for reusability, etc.
The X-37 is obviously a military device, since they're the ones using it, and it may well be meant for servicing U.S. military sats, spying on others' sats, jamming them perhaps, or outright stealing them, and, yes, maybe destroying them, but again: there's no point using the X-37 for anti-sat purposes as it's too expensive for that.
Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by stainforth on Thursday July 23, 2020 @07:11PM
(#23933818)
Why do we have all of this historical evidence about military purchasing and yet continued belief that current projects are all sensibly intended and operated?
Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by cryptonector on Thursday July 23, 2020 @08:00PM
(#23934170)
I didn't say the X-37B is used sensibly. I said it's not a practical and inexpensive anti-sat weapon. It's just not comparable.
Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by willcipriano on Thursday July 23, 2020 @09:06PM
(#23934568)
> or outright stealing them
They took a page out of Blofeld's book.
Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by enkid on Thursday July 23, 2020 @07:09PM
(#23933800)
Orbital dynamics means that literally anything in orbit could be an anti satellite weapon.
Re:UK and US say Russia fired a satellite weapon in space
by guhidalg on Thursday July 23, 2020 @07:13PM
(#23933836)
You’re technically correct, but I doubt deterrence is higher on SpaceX’s priority list than the USAF’s.