Re:Twitter is at its best when verified accounts can’t tweet
by vannevar on Thursday July 16, 2020 @03:52PM
(#23863133)
But is 4chan an inevitable product of its structure, or of its originating culture? Back when it was the next big thing, I worked with a social bookmarking startup. Weirdly, our site was colonized by a sizable group of Harry Potter fan fiction writers, and they became the dominant group on the site. If 4chan had started out with a different seed group of contributors, it might well be a very, very different place.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter is at its best when verified accounts can’t tweet
by holler on Thursday July 16, 2020 @03:59PM
(#23863202)
> If 4chan had started out with a different seed group of contributors, it might well be a very, very different place.
Hoping that's the case as I'm working on a new chat-based discussion site with no voting and goal of open, rigorous, reverent discussions (sqwok.im). I think there's merit in using signals like activity and others to determine relevance, and agree that part of the problem with 4chan is simply the ethos set in the beginning.