My take was that he wanted more girls to be involved at a younger age in tech.
If you look upstream at hiring, If I have 20 candidates and they all graduated from either a bootcamp or a cs degree, then my pool will probably reflect that ratio.
If we want to fix the representation of people in any workforce that has a barrier to entry such as previous training. Like with Engineering and college. You have to get more representation in the engineering programs.
If you want that you have to have more applications to the engineering programs. If you want that you have to de-stigmatize engineering at a young age.
That was my take away from what he said, but maybe I'm projecting.
Other comments in this thread are breaking the guidelines as well, but this one stood out.
Because they go against the narrative the proponents (irony...) of cancel culture want to impose. Why doesn't anyone ask why 13yo girls are not interested in becoming loggers, or police or trash collectors? Why are most 13yo boys not interested in becoming ballerinas?
Sure the proponents of cancel culture try to pretend there is no such thing as human biologically encoded biases: everyone is a supposed blank slate. That's why it seems a bit stupid for people who don't share their views, why try to fix human nature (as if it were possible) when you can just live with it?
Can't you take some responsibility and educate yourself rather than asking me to educate you? I'm sure you taught yourself how to program by researching online, why can't you do the same thing to understand how shitty girls and women are treated in tech domains? Unless you just don't care? I don't get it. smh.
Re your point about 4chan; provide the story or it's just another fabrication