News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by m-p-3 on Saturday July 11, 2020 @06:53PM (#23806877)
> the U.S. government will pay hackers top dollar to use whatever means necessary to get the data for them.

Probably the current state of affair anyway.

Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by Nbox9 on Sunday July 12, 2020 @02:24PM (#23813481)
Probably for some operations. This would allow more of the intercepted and decrypted messages to become evidence in court. This would encourage more law enforcement agencies to use more backdoors.

IANAL

Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by m463 on Saturday July 11, 2020 @10:15PM (#23808144)
Except out in the open with plausible ... stuff.

Kind of like how woods hole "finds" a lot of stuff in the ocean.

Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by dannyw on Sunday July 12, 2020 @02:07AM (#23809251)
I mean, if this means bounty hunters sell their exploits to the US Government instead of selling it to a financial fraud ring, that seems like a good thing.
Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by nitrogen on Sunday July 12, 2020 @01:41AM (#23809143)
Could you elaborate on the "stuff" that is found in the ocean for the purposes of this analogy?
Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by m463 on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @01:37AM (#23828862)
I suspect other arms of the government that can put a man far underwater find things in the ocean and pass it on.

so if woods hole finds something, or a hacker finds something, who knows if they got a hint from elsewhere.

Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by thecoppinger on Sunday July 12, 2020 @02:26AM (#23809325)
Second that, please - the analogy went over my head, but sounds interesting
Re:The battle to outlaw end-to-end encryption in the U.S. is... by throwawayway9 on Sunday July 12, 2020 @07:38AM (#23810600)
Could you elaborate on that?