Re:Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead
by munificent on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @01:48PM
(#23631335)
> I wonder sometimes if Google would be better off having a system set up for spinning off ideas that are complementary to their business model but distracting, or not high volume enough.
Is that not what Alphabet is?
That's what I was hoping Alphabet would be, but it seems like this bit is still a sticking point:
> or not high volume enough
Kind of a let-down
Re:Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead
by throwawaygler on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @12:40PM
(#23630284)
They just got onto a growth tear and bought a bunch of things they shouldn’t, and eventually rounded up all of the vaguely similar ones and divested.
I wonder sometimes if Google would be better off having a system set up for spinning off ideas that are complementary to their business model but distracting, or not high volume enough. Not every idea has to be a billion dollar idea, and a one time cash infusion to five $200M ideas would be a pretty small opportunity cost for them.
The fact that such ideas are not a direct competitor also achieves another goal of overly large employee pools, which is to choke off the supply of talent to upstarts.