Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney...
by flerchin on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @09:39AM
(#23627725)
With a warrant, that seems legit. You can't just say the magic words and make evidence disappear.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney...
by WrtCdEvrydy on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @09:45AM
(#23627796)
Honestly, I would have rather just encrypted everything there, reset the phone and sent it.
I wonder if this package was just to muddy the waters.
Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney...
by Jeremy1026 on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @10:00AM
(#23627942)
Without knowing anything of the case aside from reading this document. This feels like the defendant is between a rock and a hard place and they were hoping to get the information intercepted in an attempt to have the evidence thrown out as their defense strategy.
Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney...
by WrtCdEvrydy on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @02:15PM
(#23631726)
Right, I'm not a lawyer but even if you have a copy of those items that drive and phone... if it was found from a different source, would it still be inadmissable?