News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney not privileged [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney... by Jeremy1026 on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @10:00AM (#23627942)
Without knowing anything of the case aside from reading this document. This feels like the defendant is between a rock and a hard place and they were hoping to get the information intercepted in an attempt to have the evidence thrown out as their defense strategy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney... by WrtCdEvrydy on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @02:15PM (#23631726)
Right, I'm not a lawyer but even if you have a copy of those items that drive and phone... if it was found from a different source, would it still be inadmissable?
[ Parent | on HN ]