Re:Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for ...
by martinald on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @05:47AM
(#23611766)
Not sure that's true to be honest. Speech recognition on my old Pixel 2 is miles ahead of anything I've seen on any iPhone, which are 2-4x faster.
Re:Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for ...
by nmfisher on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @10:00AM
(#23614000)
Google's speech recognition is damn impressive, but I'm talking performance/power consumption, not "quality". Sticking a 2080 into an iPhone won't give you better speech recognition results, but it will give you bad results faster.
Re:Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for ...
by RNCTX on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @06:58AM
(#23626485)
Because speech recognition quality is a product of data harvesting, the one thing Google does well?
Re:Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for ...
by cesarb on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @07:30AM
(#23612530)
> > Many of these are only barely possible on "pre-neural" mobile ARM CPUs
> Speech recognition on my old Pixel 2
I don't think the Pixel 2 can be called "pre-neural". "[...] The PVC is a fully programmable image, vision and AI multi-core domain-specific architecture (DSA) for mobile devices and in future for IoT.[2] It first appeared in the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL [...]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel_Visual_Core
Re:Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for ...
by pjmlp on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @07:03AM
(#23612339)
When speech recognition starts understanding European Portuguese without me playing stupid accent exercises, and mixed language sentences as well, then I will care about it.
Many of these are only barely possible on "pre-neural" mobile ARM CPUs, and at a significant cost to power consumption. Developing for newer devices is like night and day.