Re:Ask HN: Why can't we solve the app store monopoly problem?
by Nullabillity on Saturday June 20, 2020 @02:08PM
(#23585505)
But that's not what the discussion is about. Frigidaire doesn't try to limit you to only putting stuff you bought at Walmart into their fridges.
Re:Ask HN: Why can't we solve the app store monopoly problem?
by kick on Saturday June 20, 2020 @02:13PM
(#23585544)
Nor does Apple: you can have as many PWAs as you want. As JS is Turing complete, you can then have every sort of app. They've always encouraged PWAs.
Unless you want to legally force every company to surrender their source code (which I enthusiastically would support), there's no legal basis for Apple not being able to have their proprietary feature phone locked down.
Though if you'd like, you can look at Keurig, which does limit what you can put into it to "only Keurig products" or one of the millions of other things that limit what you can put into it.
Re:Ask HN: Why can't we solve the app store monopoly problem?
by anoncake on Saturday June 20, 2020 @02:19PM
(#23585616)
> Though if you'd like, you can look at Keurig, which does limit what you can put into it to "only Keurig products" or one of the millions of other things that limit what you can put into it.
Whatabout...
Re:Ask HN: Why can't we solve the app store monopoly problem?
by bouk on Monday June 22, 2020 @04:50AM
(#23598371)
If I buy a house I can put any fridge in there. If I get an iPhone, I can only buy through the App Store.
Re:Ask HN: Why can't we solve the app store monopoly problem?
by anoncake on Saturday June 20, 2020 @02:12PM
(#23585534)
What use case is there for Fridgidaire refrigerators that cannot be fulfilled by other brands?
Re:Ask HN: Why can't we solve the app store monopoly problem?
by kick on Saturday June 20, 2020 @02:14PM
(#23585556)
What use case is there for Apple devices that cannot be fulfilled by other brands? Literally none.
I said legally-justifiable antitrust claims. Apple has a minority of the smartphone market. You can make anything into a "monopoly" if you define it narrowly enough but that's not legally justifiable in any way.