News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by alerighi on Thursday June 18, 2020 @04:52PM (#23567887)
Also Linux is becoming the new Windows, and is one of the reason I stopped using it. What is the point of using a system that on every release is more and more bloated and full of crap that it breaks?

Docker for example, I hate it, it serves no purpose beside wasting disk space and slowing down your machine. BTRFS is a bugged imitation of ZFS. Wayland not only is bugged but even does less things than Xorg.

Most scientists and academics then just don't know how to write software or administer operating systems, and if they program they write the worst crap of spaghetti code possible, no wonder they like Linux, Docker and python.

I use macOS, at least I have a system that has a decent user interface, and for my server I started using whenever I can FreeBSD, much more stable, much more simple, good documentation, a good operating system.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by SXX on Thursday June 18, 2020 @05:06PM (#23568042)
> Docker for example, I hate it, it serves no purpose beside wasting disk space and slowing down your machine.

Docker is a deployment tool and obviously needed by enterprises and I don't think anyone sane using it for their own localhost.

> BTRFS is a bugged imitation of ZFS.

You don't really have to use it though. ext works flawlessly.

> Wayland not only is bugged but even does less things than Xorg.

Check out this video from one of major X maintainer of the past:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIctzAQOe44

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by andybak on Thursday June 18, 2020 @06:36PM (#23568909)
> I don't think anyone sane using it for their own localhost

Today I learned me and a heap of web developers I know aren't sane.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by SXX on Thursday June 18, 2020 @06:58PM (#23569076)
Okay I guess I just need to sleep and had to make it somewhat more clear: I never seen anyone using docker for deployment of any software for Linux Desktop. There are superior channels formats for this purpose.

Web developers usually need docker on their localhost just so it's work the same way as production environment. Though when you compare Windows on desktop and Linux on desktop you not gonna use docker at all.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by ben-schaaf on Thursday June 18, 2020 @10:40PM (#23570468)
It's funny that you list docker and wayland as linux bloat that freebsd doesn't have, when docker works just fine on freebsd and wayland support is also in the works.

Personally I use Ubuntu as a daily driver. No docker unless you install it and comes with Xorg (as well as wayland, but you're not forced to use it).

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by anthk on Thursday June 18, 2020 @11:33PM (#23570677)
>when docker works just fine on freebsd

No, that's emulation. FreeBSD has something much better: jails.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by sergeykish on Friday June 19, 2020 @01:11AM (#23571176)
I saw here people argue about DLL hell and static compilation [1], you clearly have a point.

Using Wayland... is it Ubuntu with their experiments?

It's fine you found FreeBSD, but your choices is not Linux fault.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23453157

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by etaioinshrdlu on Thursday June 18, 2020 @06:06PM (#23568663)
I do agree that Linux has been adding complexity at a good pace the last 10 years.

I disagree about Docker. It's a good tool for reproducible development and production environments. What else should we use? virtual machines?

Scientists and academics are not in general, professional software engineers. At least they are using open source tools! What you rather they write their spaghetti in? MATLAB?

FreeBSD does not have the mindshare and ecosystem that Linux does. That actually does matter.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by Dylan16807 on Thursday June 18, 2020 @06:16PM (#23568751)
> BTRFS is a bugged imitation of ZFS.

It has bugs, but at least it supports copy-on-write files and making snapshots writable.