I think you are trying to confuse others with numbers describing the Donbas conflict, not the "annexation" as implied in your message. A really low effort fallacy I must say.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Ru...
Wow. So, you going to claim this isn't relevant or somehow correct then either?
>For the "actively supported", where are you getting that information?
Directly from Crimeans. I have visited Crimea last year as a tourist and talked with them personally (in Massandra and Alushta, btw the wine is really great, recommend trying it). Try watching 2014 videos, for example this one is before Russian forces have became active:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atm0W5wA2y4
If you don't trust my anecdotal experience, then how about "The Crimea conundrum: legitimacy and public opinion after annexation" published in the Eurasian Geography and Economics journal? Or how about "To Russia With Love" article published in Foreign Affairs? They both confirm strong local support in favor of the transfer.
>My impression (from friends in Kiev) is that it's universally condemned.
I hope you understand that your friend quite probably is really biased regarding this issue, right? Always try looking outside of the media narrative (one may call it soft propaganda), usually world issues are far more complex than the version painted by media.
The irony is strong with this one.
Whereas in Taiwan, recent survey shows only 4% identified as Chinese and 90% are willing to defend Taiwan if "China uses force against Taiwan for unification"
Small nitpick: has US invaded Syria in your opinion?
Yes, Russia obviously supports Donbas republics, but most of those republics military consists of Ukrainian citizens. In a way it's similar to how US supports Kurds and "moderate opposition". Such situation is really common for civil wars, but I don't think "invasion" is a correct word to use here.
Russia literally claimed Ukrainian territory. How is "invasion" in any way the wrong word?
That seems like an unusual perspective.
If by "bloodless" you mean "lots of people died, but nowhere near as many as a world war" though, then sure.
For the "actively supported", where are you getting that information? My impression (from friends in Kiev) is that it's universally condemned.