Re:New Facebook tool allows employers to suppress “unionize”...
by Apocryphon on Friday June 12, 2020 @02:45PM
(#23502349)
Reminds me of a Stewart Lee bit about people confusing things with health and safety legislation:
Re:New Facebook tool allows employers to suppress “unionize”...
by jimmaswell on Friday June 12, 2020 @03:24PM
(#23502697)
>someone I know
For reference I volunteered at a convention there, which is how I know all this.
Re:New Facebook tool allows employers to suppress “unionize”...
by dspillett on Friday June 12, 2020 @06:52PM
(#23504692)
As I expand lower down: it certainly does happen, and on your example did.
But I suspect it happens less often due to union matters than the oft regaled stories suggest, possibly less overall too.
I've actually experienced it twice, but neither case had anything to do with unions.
One was officially a Health and safety matter (if you'd not been on the manually handling course you should not be moving heave expensive bits of equipment around) though I suspect it was really more of an insurance matter (only the relevant people should be moving the expensive equipment, or accidental damages won't be covered). Commercial arse-shielding, no unions involved.
The other was again commercial: in an outsourced IT arrangement where all equipment moves had to be done by someone on the outsourced team. This of course carried a charge for time, but if it wasn't done that way the contract said the charge could still be made with additional charges for the extra paperwork. Again, a purely commercial matter, no unions present affecting the matter in either company.