It can be, but it kind of should be the other way around. Your identity and your values should inform what political party you should belong to. Your political party shouldn't inform your identity.
There should be things you disagree with your party about.
Re:Weirdos in the depression
by TulliusCicero on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:45PM
(#23409203)
I mean, being a proud Democrat or Republican doesn't mean you agree with your party in 100% of issues.
Re:Weirdos in the depression
by invalidOrTaken on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @11:36AM
(#23404539)
It very much can be, you're right, but I think grandparent is taking it for granted (and I agree that it should be) that this is a smallish, petty identity, unworthy of containing a human soul.
Re:Weirdos in the depression
by TulliusCicero on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:43PM
(#23409179)
That seems awfully judgy. If you think a political party is unworthy of contributing to one's identity, I shudder to think what you'd say about me identifying as a Starcraft player.
Re:Weirdos in the depression
by invalidOrTaken on Thursday June 04, 2020 @12:25AM
(#23412390)
I'm a Starcraft player too. But I am not just a Starcraft player, and neither are you.
Then they should rethink their priorities. Ideals are far more important than party affiliation.
Re:Weirdos in the depression
by TulliusCicero on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:44PM
(#23409194)
Ideas are cheap. Execution is hard. It's as true in politics as it is in startups.
Parties aren't the only way to contribute to 'execution', of course, but they're one of the most obvious.
What do you mean by "confuse"? What if their political party/orientation is an important part of their identity?