News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by FireBeyond on Monday June 01, 2020 @01:52PM (#23381457)
Where your argument fails is that nowhere in the Constitution, or quotes like that is mentioned the right to be _heard_. You have no inherent right to an audience (either on Facebook, or in a public place). In-person, I can walk away. But the virtual equivalent is "stifling"?
Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by keiferski on Monday June 01, 2020 @01:56PM (#23381522)
> It has nothing to do with the legal definition of free speech.

I am not talking about the Constitution. I’m talking about a cultural value. Not the same thing.

Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by FireBeyond on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:12PM (#23381747)
These people, groups, organizations are not having their ability to speak stifled. They're having their choice of location stifled. There are plenty of people willing to host views that others might find unpleasant. From Gab, to Voat, to nearlyfreespeech.net, self-hosting and the like.

Now if your argument is (as often, theirs is) that those platforms are fringe, not nearly-as-popular, I would theorize that that is because a larger majority of people have heard some of these things and have zero interest in hearing more.

But they can still say it.

And at that point, I ask, what is the cultural value of requiring people to hear things they've decided they do not wish to?

Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by keiferski on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:52PM (#23382227)
I don’t have a problem with people deciding they don’t want to hear certain speech. I have a problem with someone else making that decision for me, unbeknownst to me, and on nuanced issues like contemporary politics (not the fairly straightforward stuff that ends up on Gab.)

Even then, I’d still prefer a totally open system that lets me decide what I want to see/not see, because it avoids any potential censorship.

Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by kinjba11 on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:14PM (#23383225)
People and systems are deciding what you see and do not see every day. From moderators on HN to the algorithms on every Facebook and Google product. When you search on Google and get a trillion results, you are letting Google choose for you by ranking pages. I am extremely thankful for those services as I would be sad if I had to wade through a trillion results and decide what to see/not see myself. I expect these companies and people to filter out BS I do not want.

None of that prevents me from hosting my own website, or going to a public space, and saying whatever I want.

Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by yladiz on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:11PM (#23381740)
You can't say that and use the quote in the original comment. The quote references a right, which comes from laws and the Constitution, yet you mention a cultural value instead. Which are you talking about here, the right of free speech, or the cultural value of free speech?
Re:Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Tr... by bryan_w on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @01:41PM (#23393731)
Rights don't come from laws, we are endowed with them by our creator.