Re:Supreme Court says state may enforce some restrictions on...
by gizmo686 on Saturday May 30, 2020 @03:30PM
(#23363893)
I do not see any statement from Alito, but he voted with the dissent.
The position of Roberts (writing for the majority) is that:
> Where those broad limits are not exceeded, they should not be subject to second-guessing by an “unelected federal judiciary,"
Which is to say, even the majority acknlowdges that there are times where the courts should intervene. The question of what a "comparable" secular activity is is very much a legal one.
The position of Roberts (writing for the majority) is that:
> Where those broad limits are not exceeded, they should not be subject to second-guessing by an “unelected federal judiciary,"
Which is to say, even the majority acknlowdges that there are times where the courts should intervene. The question of what a "comparable" secular activity is is very much a legal one.