Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship

Re:Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship by Overtonwindow on Friday May 29, 2020 @12:37PM (#23352141)

There was never any russian collusion, we know that for a fact now. HN can continue to censor this but it's true, and Twitter not recognizing that as disinformation is why they should be regulated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship by coolgeek on Friday May 29, 2020 @12:56PM (#23352419)

Here are some actual facts, rather than assertions or WSJ editorials (as opposed to reported articles)

https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-repo...

It's almost surreal that users named Overtonwindow and Simulacra are pushing the "no collusion" narrative

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship by bedhesd on Friday May 29, 2020 @03:21PM (#23354380)

Thanks for checking in, but it still is contrary to what the House of Representatives founds. Your truth that there was collusion is met with other truths that there were not. Is it twitter's role to decide who is right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship by coolgeek on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:37PM (#23383492)

The Republicans on HPSCI found what they wanted to find, and avoided finding what they didn't want to find. See the HPSCI minority report for the specific details on this.

Much of the HPSCI majority report is also contradicted by:

  - bipartisan Senate reports
  - the Special Counsel's report
  - the Special Counsel's indictments
  - the FBI, as well as the intelligence community (in toto)
  - the DOJ and intelligence Inspectors General

IOW, it was contradicted by everybody else

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship by Simulacra on Friday May 29, 2020 @12:46PM (#23352290)

From the Editorial Board of the Wall Street Journal:

"Newly released documents show he [Adam Schiff] knew all along that there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts... 11589326164

So why not put a disclaimer on every politician that says there WAS collusion, or claiming to have evidence of collusion?

[ Parent | on HN ]