https://twitter.com/kateconger/status/1265675205680099328
Plus the response from Jack Dorsey yesterday:
> Fact check: there is someone ultimately accountable for our actions as a company, and that’s me. Please leave our employees out of this. We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-repo...
It's almost surreal that users named Overtonwindow and Simulacra are pushing the "no collusion" narrative
Much of the HPSCI majority report is also contradicted by:
- bipartisan Senate reports
- the Special Counsel's report
- the Special Counsel's indictments
- the FBI, as well as the intelligence community (in toto)
- the DOJ and intelligence Inspectors General
"Newly released documents show he [Adam Schiff] knew all along that there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts... 11589326164
So why not put a disclaimer on every politician that says there WAS collusion, or claiming to have evidence of collusion?
> Twitter now selectively decides to place a warning label on certain tweets in a manner that clearly reflects political bias. As has been reported, Twitter seems never to have placed such a label on another politician’s tweet. As recently as last week, Representative Adam Schiff was continuing to mislead his followers by peddling the long-disproved Russian Collusion Hoax, and Twitter did not flag those tweets. Unsurprisingly, its officer in charge of so-called ‘Site Integrity’ has flaunted his political bias in his own tweets.