News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning. Parent comment

Re:Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning by dmode on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @11:22PM (#23319059)
California has been running absentee ballots for a long time. Are you saying all of them had "substantial fraud" ? If so, why didn't the President, who had control of 3 branches of govt and had a commission to prove election fraud, couldn't find any evidence ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning by lordlimecat on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @09:22AM (#23322733)
Why not just claim that your network could not possibly be compromised despite no IDS / HIDS / AV? I'm sure there would be no evidence there, either.

What evidence of fraud would you expect? How would anyone know? And given the sophistication of fraud these days (bypassing 2fa, number porting, etc) - - how could you possibly expect zero fraud in a system whose only controls are human?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning by blockmarker on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @02:14AM (#23319904)
What I heard was that California refused to cooperate, and the commission couldn't do much without their cooperation. Though this is only a rumor I heard.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning by moeadham on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @04:49AM (#23320902)
If it’s a rumor why are you repeating it.

Your are spreading false narratives. Stop.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning by wafn on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @09:02AM (#23322499)
Not a false narrative.

https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/news-releases-and-advi...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning by moeadham on Thursday May 28, 2020 @07:33AM (#23336089)
You obviously did not even read that article.
[ Parent | on HN ]