News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calculus Made Easy (1914) [pdf] by hodgedual on Thursday May 21, 2020 @04:53PM (#23265122)
You know, I never understood this. Limits (how a function behaves as dx approaches zero) are much easier (for me) to understand than infinitesimals (an idea which obviously can't even exist on the real line), and it's much harder to end up in contradiction.
Re:Calculus Made Easy (1914) [pdf] by Koshkin on Thursday May 21, 2020 @05:20PM (#23265527)
Yet, the idea of infinitesimals is very popular in applications. For example, in undergrad physics courses, when deriving formulas (essentially, doing math!) they keep talking about a "small area" or a "small volume" (where a given function is assumed to stay constant).
Re:Calculus Made Easy (1914) [pdf] by HPsquared on Friday May 22, 2020 @05:59AM (#23270350)
That's the beauty of mathematics - two people are able to approach a question from totally different perspectives, and produce the same result.
Re:Calculus Made Easy (1914) [pdf] by madhadron on Thursday May 21, 2020 @09:46PM (#23267884)
When you're actually computing things, such as numerically approximating an integral, you do so by breaking it into small pieces and adding them together. Infinitesimals are the limit of that process as the smallness goes to zero. I think the key problem here is that students use the symbolic rules but never actually do numerical computations of this kind.
Re:Calculus Made Easy (1914) [pdf] by todd8 on Thursday May 21, 2020 @04:57PM (#23265194)
I agree, I was a math major and remember how high school calculus using infinitesimals ended up confusing my friends in college.