News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by MattGaiser on Monday May 18, 2020 @03:09PM (#23227035)
> "critical business function" gets shoved into the backlog to never be seen again.

Never worked for a unicorn, but everything from big corp to startup to government. "Urgent" provokes no reaction from me anymore because of this.

Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by trhway on Monday May 18, 2020 @03:56PM (#23227585)
>"Urgent"

,"Critically Important", etc. is the most recent whatever caught the attention of a typical S/E/VP with the attention span of a ferret long enough for him/her to be able to utter it in the words. If you're able to highly visibly jump and demonstrate activity during exact that moment - a great talent leading to advancements/promotions - there is no point to react as the next new "critical" directive/change of course/etc. is coming very soon. Of course if your manager is one of those aspiring "talented jumpers", he/she will try to make you jump with him/her - it is a real PITA to have such a manager who instead of filtering and protecting the team from would amplify all that stuff flowing down.

Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by MattGaiser on Monday May 18, 2020 @04:10PM (#23227747)
I am shocked at how often I can just ignore an annoying email and have the issue go away...
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by bigiain on Monday May 18, 2020 @09:36PM (#23230440)
"Never put of until tomorrow anything you can get out of altogether"
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by ErikAugust on Monday May 18, 2020 @04:41PM (#23228082)
I wonder if there is a way to convert Harvard Business Review articles into top-of-the-backlog items automatically...
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by HeyLaughingBoy on Monday May 18, 2020 @05:28PM (#23228584)
There's your Startup Idea!
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by MattGaiser on Monday May 18, 2020 @05:45PM (#23228743)
You jest, but an email to backlog service is something some managers might buy.
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by MandieD on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @09:53AM (#23234866)
Gasping in horror at the prospect of that JIRA plug-in coming into being, especially since even I, a casual admin for our Atlassian products, have a good idea what combination of API calls would make that happen.
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by Fauntleroy on Monday May 18, 2020 @03:32PM (#23227308)
The only truly urgent thing I've seen is a product being down / a critical bug in production.
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by greenyoda on Monday May 18, 2020 @05:47PM (#23228767)
Anything that can cause your company to lose a lot of money can be truly urgent. For example, your biggest customer needs a new feature, and if they don't get it by the end of the quarter, they'll switch to your competitor.

On the other hand, artificial deadlines that are invented by your company's management are usually not urgent.

Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by freeone3000 on Monday May 18, 2020 @08:48PM (#23230141)
How can a person working on features tell the difference between critical and non-critical features?
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by blaser-waffle on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @10:42AM (#23235370)
Ignore it and see how many calls you get
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by brianwawok on Monday May 18, 2020 @11:15PM (#23230978)
Go to lunch with the PM?
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by user5994461 on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @12:04PM (#23236388)
A large company would never manage to switch to a competitor in one quarter. And they try any hard, it most likely means their getting a cashback under the table for the new contract, or other perk of the sort, the feature is just an excuse.
Re:Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices by joejerryronnie on Monday May 18, 2020 @11:03PM (#23230910)
When I was working at Stanford, a new colleague came rushing out of a meeting ready to start a big new initiative because our VP said something should get done. I had to explain that patience was important because no single person at the University could make a project happen, but hundreds of people at all levels of the org chart could stop a major initiative in it’s tracks if they felt threatened.