Are you disagreeing with Nancy then? Since the 60's SF has had a continuous (60 years!) progressive rule and this is what we end up with.
Looking at the major problems in SF, I see a direct link to SF government policies:
Crime - stop locking people up!
Homelessness - we just need to spend more money!
Schooling - we just need more money!
Housing - unless it's subsidized, we'll block it every time
Never even entertained the thought the entire approach was wrong.
I find it absolutely astounding that people somehow think that SF's problems weren't caused by a specific set of policy proposals and politics. Yet, if anyone brings this up, even in a nonpartisan manner, all of a sudden the criticism is supposedly nullified because it's not coming from "our people". I find that more than a tad self-serving and duplicitous.
We’re all aware of SFs problems, not sure why this article is worth even a glance.