News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Faster and more flexible pipelines with a Directed Acycli... by colonwqbang on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @12:37PM (#23156020)
This is funny to me since essentially all build/test/etc systems in the past 40+ years have been based around a DAG model.

They are rediscovering the basic features of Make et al.

Re:Faster and more flexible pipelines with a Directed Acycli... by throwaway02318 on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @01:13PM (#23156522)
The fact that everyone goes out of their way to reinvent this really goes to show how awful the Make experience is.
Re:Faster and more flexible pipelines with a Directed Acycli... by gnulinux on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @02:23PM (#23157645)
I have a pretty awesome experience with make. If you use it for what it's designed for i.e. building files from a graph of dependencies, it's pretty handy. I use for auto-generated code, binary code as well as tasks that depend on other tasks, such as logging into system A requires getting this key from AWS etc. Most people have bash shortcuts for simple scripts to automate things, I instead write Makefiles, since it seems closer to my mental model, you want to do X but doing X depends on resources Y Z T, make figures out the rest.
Re:Faster and more flexible pipelines with a Directed Acycli... by nightfly on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @01:40PM (#23156973)
Unless you're working on something complex, Make is pretty great. My only complaint as a regular use is the lack of support for spaces in target names.