News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber loses $2.9B, offloads bike and scooter business by TylerE on Friday May 08, 2020 @07:33PM (#23120685)
> Nobody could answer the question, “How is self-driving cheaper than exploiting human drivers like they are now?”

Huh?

There are SEVERAL obvious advantages.

* AI drivers don't get tired - they can drive 24 hrs/day if there's demand. This lowers cost because the (fixed) cost of the vehicle is amortized over more rides.

* They don't get a cut. See above.

* AI doesn't incur hr costs and can't sue you or try to unionize

Re:Uber loses $2.9B, offloads bike and scooter business by listenallyall on Friday May 08, 2020 @08:13PM (#23120929)
Consider a very simple city model which requires 10,000 cars to meet demand during rush hour (3 morning hours, 3 evening hours) and 4,000 cars to meet demand the rest of the time.

A self-driving model requires the up-front purchase of 10,000 cars, 6,000 of which sit idle 18 hours per day, earning nothing. Meanwhile Uber and Lyft have zero up-front costs, and only pay drivers when the company itself is earning revenue (and presumably, a marginal profit).

Re:Uber loses $2.9B, offloads bike and scooter business by paulcole on Friday May 08, 2020 @07:40PM (#23120723)
Who owns the AI-driven car? Who maintains it?

Either Uber is spending a shitload of money to build, maintain, and replace their own fleet or they‘ll be leasing cars from private car owners for about what they paid human drivers in the first place.