The FSF provides what is expected of it: Dogmatic consistency and a warning that without a certain set of freedoms you are a sharecropper.

The reason you don't see a more practical suggestion from them is the suggestion involves "none of the currently above options".

True this. Two points of "extremism" (say in this case, the FSF and Microsoft) has it's place in establishing a solid middle ground.

When did the FSF say not to browse the web? Yes there is the "non-free" JS stuff, which IMO does have a point. It can be split into the issue of obfuscated and license-free JS.

He's referring to how RMS has said that he browses the Web. I think it was more of a painting of the lifestyle as a whole, rather than a specific edict from the FSF.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/134979

Yea, doesn't mean that he would recommend it to others.

They are not asking to avoid Android altogether, just the market.

Most Android devices are locked down so that users cannot install apps outside the Android Market (aka "sideloading").

Of course those of us who know about xda-developers.com and are handy with adb can easily bypass this in most cases. But we're in the minority. The average joe, the vast majority of the user base is either incapable or unwilling to do these things.

Unless you've got a rooted & bootloader-unlocked device running an AOSP-derived ROM, Google's dream of an open mobile device OS only applies to the carriers.

"Most Android devices are locked down so that users cannot install apps outside the Android Market (aka "sideloading")."

This is new to me. Got any proof?

As far as I know in the US it's just AT&T.

My phone is stock, not rooted, it has a checkbox to install non-market apps and that works fine. Not sure what they're on about.

You almost seem like you are setting up Ted Kaczynsky = Richard Stallman. We have anti-tech, lives in cabin, and extremely dogmatic.

Perhaps next we will have GPL with logic bombs sent via email...

Yeah, it was a joke. Still,seriously any strongly dogmatic organization will exhibit obvious inconsistencies of common sense, while holding to the logic they ascribe to.

It's Ted Kaczynski, and you're seriously reading what you want to read there. That's not what I got from it at all.

Jokes are also amusing.