TheAmazingIdiot
TheAmazingIdiot on Hacker News
The fact the webserver willingly gave the information I requested to me (did not 403 or 531), so I must be authorized.
He also despises republicans completely, given this thread alone.
I'd set equal the anger in Tptacek to the craziness in sparrowos.
Trespass: up to 30 days in jail and/or 100$ fine
!!!COMPUTER!!! trespass: Years and years in jail, hundreds of thousands of dollars fine, Federal felony.
Yeah. SOUNDS LEGIT.
Hosting with The Pirate Bay would seem like an option. They seem to have 'stop shutdowns' stopped pretty well.
If it is free, they can do this anytime they like. Your proper answer is to set up your own server and do it yourself. I guess taking it public and getting responses from individuals in that company is your response. Still doesn't mean you shouldn't set up shop in your own right.
</rant=off>
Try something more vertical niche, and hunker down. A fill-in-the-blank game is not super-profit worthy. Even Rovio took a decade before they hit it with Angry Birds.
I think this is a problem too: Price: Free
Well, unless you make up for it in quantity...?
"Intentionally accessing a computer without authorization to obtain: ....Information from any protected computer."
What does 'without authorization' mean, and what does 'protected' mean?
Does without authorization mean you violate a click-through license? Or is there some nebulous authentication chit you are handed? Is it a felony to fake your name on a website demanding your name?
And with that keyword 'protected', how do we know it is indeed protected? What steps one must take to protect, and what steps one must go through to understand that it is indeed protected computer/data?
In other words, we are all felons-on-standby. The laws are so vague as to entrap all by default.
Whether that be buying DVDs, software, books, watches, or any type of good or service, the big buys will try to make it illegal.
Boo fucking hoo.
That's why these petitions are an utter joke.
The the time I saw it hit front page here, to now hasn't been that long. Must have hurt their bottom line.
I would argue that value would be gained by sacking these people (and organizations).
Most of the money they (and other journals) uses is dependent on excessive licensing fees charged to universities. The universities turn around and add that to each person's tuition.
And all the work the journal publishes WAS owned by the students of the very university, until the journal demands transfer of copyright to the journal... So they can sell them back work at 1000X the profit.
By definition, they are parasites. What we need is a good anti-parasitic medicine.
Since I do not follow the EULA/license agreement for each website, and I send a handshake requesting files over a webserver, I am in violation of federal law for unauthorized computer usage.
That's fucking bullshit.
I'm sorry, cmsmith.
The only real cost is bandwidth. That's when you have the schools host these cheap servers. "instead of 15 million USD, we want to colo. Deal?"
And to completely trounce your idea, publishing is easy for journals. It's called "load page and press print". There's hardly any reason to print tomes that can easily loaded ip on a web page as needed. And if you need a bound book, go to lulu or other JIT publisher.
The social contract in the constitution was to grant people with limited exclusivity for works they created. Patents have roughly stayed within that parameter (with exception to patent abuses on design and software).
For copyright, it was originally 17 years, extendable another 17 years. Works released in 1981 (my date of birth) will expire in 120 years. I will be dead before they are in public domain.
The social contract was 'reneogiated' by campaign donations, without input from the people. The supreme court found that forever extensions the way congress is implementing them as 'constitutional' and it was Congress's problem.
So yes, I believe that should open up the debate on piracy as a legitimate solution.
Can I have my upvote?
Just substitute internet for real life.
There is a time and place for everything.
Admittedly, ice is rather difficult in any condition. However, many human drivers drive safely on snow cover with minimal problems. Accidents are higher during those times, but traffic still keeps flowing. Google-car-AI cannot handle these events at all (at this time).
This topic is interesting in quite a few aspects. Firstly, it's something I thought of long ago, but due to implementation details (ECM is a closed, obfuscated PITA).
The biggest ideas revolving around this com device is how it processes the communication. Is the communication an authenticated protocol? Being an amateur radio operator and a fellow hacker, I can think of plenty of things to do regarding this device, both good and bad. Does it take "suggestions" from other devices? If so, do these suggestions get stored in a sort of a log to prove action your AI takes is the fault of another?
And there's the security involved in the local processor. Many in this community are turned off to the idea of secure computing. In this case however, could lead to a bad user fake-signing messages to other cars. This is an open question, due to many secure implementations successfully hacked (Nintendo DS, PS2, PS3, Blu-Ray, various media stores).
I'm sure there is a way to make a car-puter that interfaces with other vehicles for a mesh network. However, I would believe that this network would have to be one of those close to being mathematically provable languages. And I would not think that TOYOTA would be capable of this.
Use their own tax cheating against themselves.
The energy translation used to flip a slight positive temp to a negative temp sounds like a reflection to the negative side of the curve.
No driver, no workey.
Being a citizen of Indiana, I am embarrassed to have such people at the helm in this country. It is all [pro-democrat, hate republican] or [pro-republican, hate democrat] with no room for even discussion of what works or not. It's all platform based demagoguery.
Complete aside: Mind exploded from unit mismatch. Miles per hour then meters? Gah....
Just please dont use gradians for angle measurement :)
It's the last artifact of a physical object used to measure all others. And that fucker changes weight too, so the kilogram ISNT stable. Its just like all those nasty imperial measurements used to be.
When I make short meads, I do it a little more off the cuff.. Then it's what tastes right for the honey water in terms of concentration.
I asked him to please explain this unfamiliar unit to us. He was rather surprised we hadn't heard of it prior. One very good thing about metric is that it is precise in the definitions of the units. Hence the distinction between kg and N.
Added note: even though pound may be technically a force measurement, it at first confused the hell out of me how a pascal( N/m^2) could be converted to lbs/in^2. I did wonder what exactly a pound was, but soon didn't really care. After all, we didn't really use imperial much, with exception of general "consumer measurements".