Angry Birds raise $42M?

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by latch on Thursday March 10, 2011 @10:04AM (#2309315)

This doesn't seem too crazy to me. I see three things here: the Angry Birds Games, the Angry Birds Brand, and Rovio.

I can't help but think that the brand itself has huge potential. Put this in the hands of Disney say, with movies, merchandise and licensing (McD Angry Birds Happy Meals) and the brand is probably worth at least a couple hundred millions. Not saying it's a given, they need to execute properly. Anyone remember Club Penguin (it's still around)...this seems way bigger than that.

This game is also well suited for the ultimate platform: game boy. That could be worth a little goldmine itself.

As for the developer, I have no clue, but I wouldn't bet against their next project.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by pclark on Thursday March 10, 2011 @10:15AM (#2309351)

You realise the Game Boy has been discontinued for many years?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by latch on Thursday March 10, 2011 @10:22AM (#2309379)

Sorry, I mean whatever current portable gaming device nintendo is selling tens and tens of millions of.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by Hovertruck on Thursday March 10, 2011 @10:27AM (#2309400)

Just for the record, that's the Nintendo DS, which is also a touch screen (albeit with a stylus) so the gameplay wouldn't really suffer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by pclark on Thursday March 10, 2011 @10:34AM (#2309430)

There are more iOS devices than Nintendo DS devices, for what its worth.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by ultrasaurus on Thursday March 10, 2011 @11:47AM (#2309746)

But they're a demographic that bought them so that they could spend $20+ regularly on video games so you could expect penetration or prices to be higher.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by latch on Thursday March 10, 2011 @07:05PM (#2311391)

and there are more people in Europe than the USA - but that doesn't mean you ignore the US market.

Even if all things were equal, Nintendo portable is still a huge market. While the lines are blurring, I still think DS is a game device, and iOS isn't - specifically with respect to how much people pay/expect from games. The development costs for DS would be higher - as you'd have to build a longer game, but the so too would the margins.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by mrcharles on Thursday March 10, 2011 @10:49AM (#2309489)

Given that Nintendo is currently afraid of the iOS platform, I don't think it's a given that putting it on DS would mean much.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by MicahSeff on Thursday March 10, 2011 @04:27PM (#2310864)

I don't know why you'd say that Nintendo is afraid of iOS. Or rather, the reasons for them being afraid of mobile platforms is a little different than you are implying. During Iwata's keynote at GDC, he spent a while talking about these platforms and how they are saturating the market with low-quality games that are bogging down the industry as a whole and lessening the value of big budget, well-produced games made by your more traditional gaming companies. He's afraid that the value of content will decrease as the amount of content available increases, which is certainly a valid concern.

If you meant that Nintendo should be afraid of the massive success of iOS, then yeah, I kind of agree. Still, making a sequel to a monumentally successful mobile game on the most successful gaming console at the moment (or its 3D successor, due to launch soon) would hardly be a bad idea. Yeah, lots of "non-gamers" love Angry Birds, but that's the same market that Nintendo had been going after with the DS in the first place (remember Brain Training?).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Angry Birds raise $42M? by mrcharles on Friday March 11, 2011 @09:49AM (#2313467)

Railing against the quality of games on the platform is rich, coming from Nintendo, since the Wii is a landing zone for shovelware like never before, and the DS has been just as bad.

I chose to interpret their GDC keynote as an attack from being backed in to a corner. Someone else stole their schtick, and now they are panicking.

[ Parent | on HN ]