News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Japan to Draw Up UFO Encounter Protocols After U.S. Footage by lend000 on Sunday May 03, 2020 @10:07PM (#23063856)
We don't know that he's right, and the Navy has officially verified the videos belong to them just last week -- these aren't a product of the organization that released them. However, the Go Fast video was not the interesting one from a witness testimony standpoint. See the Nimitz incident [0], in which the object was observed by dozens of witnesses from several vantage points, including three fighters (at two different times), the passive radar on the Nimitz (intermittently for over a week), and an AWACS.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz_UFO_incident

Re:Japan to Draw Up UFO Encounter Protocols After U.S. Footage by catalogia on Sunday May 03, 2020 @11:22PM (#23064232)
Whether we know anything at all is a matter I'll leave to philosophers. I'm sufficiently confident that he's right about the Go Fast video that I'd bet my left nut on it.

The Go Fast video being wrapped up in this matter leads me to conclude that the Navy didn't try very hard to figure out that video, which leaves me with no reason to believe they tried harder with the others.

Re:Japan to Draw Up UFO Encounter Protocols After U.S. Footage by Smoosh on Monday May 04, 2020 @01:01AM (#23064721)
Or that the Navy is happy with these pedestrian explanations, but realize that the public will claim "weather balloons again, another government cover-up" if they provide such an explanation. So they release them as "unexplained" without further comment.