Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co...
by anigbrowl on Thursday April 23, 2020 @10:05PM
(#22963903)
Since its establishment by treaty and your sovereign nation of origin becoming a signatory to said treaty. Surely you can make the same point about your skepticism of transnational organizations without all the emotional theatrics, perhaps by researching the topic you aver to care about and highlighting what you believe to be its constitutional inadequacies.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co...
by grawprog on Friday April 24, 2020 @05:42PM
(#22973219)
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/transcr...
>Now we need to go and look in families to find those people who may be sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner so that's what I was saying previously; the transition from movement restrictions and shut-downs
I believe unlawfully removing people from their homes and restricting their movement is against the constitutions of several countries, mine for sure. According to this transcript directly from the WHO, this is what they advocate and recommend. Speaking out against this falls under directly contradicting the WHO.