Not saying that everyone with a bunker falls into this category. But it's certainly true that when the best resourced and connected among us have the means to withdraw comfortably, their aggregate effort to remedy whatever is causing the disruption will diminish.
Most people here have home fire insurance coverage but don't have extinguishers (or haven't checked them in years), sprinklers, or a fire safe. So is fire insurance coverage bad?
Fire risks the loss of things that insurance cannot replace, such as your face, dog, or offspring.
I think the fear is of billionaires using money to save the bits they want by running away rather than the bits you want by fixing the society.
Once this is all over, they'll want to stroll back in like nothing happened. Ideally, we won't let them back in.
Some basic risk analysis shows the trip increases risks and is therefore a dumb move even if the idea of a bunker could be useful in other situations.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/e2-80-98we-needed-to-go...
> Is buying a lot of insurance also evil?
Generally, I don’t think so. Insurance exists to protect one’s finances, and it’s one of the oldest financial instruments out there. But you can’t eat an insurance policy, it can’t sustain life.
Is buying a lot of insurance also evil?