Re:Pennsylvania factory team clocks out after 28 days of liv...
by jeromegv on Thursday April 23, 2020 @01:35PM
(#22958506)
Did any of them actually travelled to their bunker? Or are you blaming them for something that didn't happen?
Re:Pennsylvania factory team clocks out after 28 days of liv...
by techsupporter on Thursday April 23, 2020 @01:36PM
(#22958518)
According to published reports, yes:
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/e2-80-98we-needed-to-go...
Re:Pennsylvania factory team clocks out after 28 days of liv...
by bdamm on Thursday April 23, 2020 @01:56PM
(#22958792)
This is a form of critical thinking error. "They" wanted to build a safe destination in case of a multitude of possible conditions come to occur. You are looking with a historical lens on what has happened and then labeling them "dumb" based on the knowledge we have now. If you look at it that way, almost any disaster planning is "dumb".
Re:Pennsylvania factory team clocks out after 28 days of liv...
by Retric on Thursday April 23, 2020 @02:51PM
(#22959588)
No, you misunderstand. I am saying owning a bunker may be a valuable thing in some emergency’s. However, just because this is an emergency does not mean going to a bunker now is a good idea.
Some basic risk analysis shows the trip increases risks and is therefore a dumb move even if the idea of a bunker could be useful in other situations.