News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by smitty1e on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:18PM (#22929380)
This is the government suppressing speech by proxy.

Even if it survives legal review, this harms the spirit of the Bill of Rights, which is incorporated against the States.

Voters should reply in November with their ballots as appropriate.

Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by agildehaus on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:34PM (#22929549)
Where's the government in this? The government isn't forcing Facebook's hand.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by Lammy on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:39PM (#22929596)
The government can be forcing Facebook's hand by making Facebook fearful of being investigated, fined, broken up, etc if they are found to have allowed manipulation of the 2020 election in any way, and the coronavirus and related topics have become unfortunately intertwined in that.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by CamperBob2 on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:53PM (#22929735)
Huh? If any forcing is going on -- which there isn't -- they would presumably be forced to toe the Trump party line, not to suppress or censor it. Wouldn't the present Federal government be happy if Facebook were to encourage protests and general disrespect for warnings from health authorities? If anything, Facebook's actions here are courageous.

It takes a lot to get me to defend Facebook, but the arguments popping up in this thread are proving to be more than sufficient.

Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by sfkdjf9j3j on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:43PM (#22930204)
Well, the official Trump party line is indeed that social distancing and other restrictions are still necessary. This is a very confusing situation since the protesters against the protective measures seem to be almost exclusively from Trump's base.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by CamperBob2 on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:43PM (#22929642)
And forcing Facebook to publish points of view they disagree with doesn't harm the Bill of Rights?
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by a1369209993 on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:44PM (#22929648)
Of course not. Facebook is a corporation; people are what have rights.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by otterley on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:13PM (#22929923)
As assemblies of people, corporations have rights. In fact, the right of the people to peaceably assemble and petition the Government for redress of grievances is explicitly protected in the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by CamperBob2 on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:45PM (#22929657)
So Facebook is an organization of what, robots?

Are you OK with similar rights being stripped from your hometown newspaper on the grounds that they are a "corporation", despite the explicit specification of the press as a protected entity in the First Amendment?

Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by oldsklgdfth on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:16PM (#22929949)
In America, corporations are people.

Citizens United v. FEC

Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by SamWhited on Monday April 20, 2020 @10:52PM (#22931354)
This doesn't mean what you think it means. Not all rights that attach to people attach to corporations. The bill of rights doesn't uniformly apply to corporations, and different rights may or may not attach under certain circumstances.
Re:Facebook says it has removed promotion of anti-quarantine... by a1369209993 on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:43AM (#22931975)
More importantly, the government declaring something doesn't make true. See anything from the entire Soviet Union to the various attempts to legislate that π = 3.