News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on California Supreme Court: Transaction is not required to sue online providers. Parent comment

Re:California Supreme Court: Transaction is not required to ... by jayd16 on Sunday April 12, 2020 @07:02PM (#22851672)
You would need to show intent either way. If the intent is proven to discriminate based one of several owners I think the protection would still apply.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:California Supreme Court: Transaction is not required to ... by ineedasername on Sunday April 12, 2020 @11:22PM (#22852910)
Under "disparate impact" [0], intent is not required.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

[ Parent | on HN ]