Re:QuakeJS – A Quake Port to JavaScript with Emscripten
by pjmlp on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @09:03AM
(#22802786)
As shown at the start of the thread, with Flash Alchemy, already in 2011.
Those people are the ones with an agenda to spread WebAssembly as above anything else in regards to safety, and the very first attempt to have a bytecode format for C and C++ code, when IBM and Unisys mainframes, CLR, Brew, Tendra, PNaCL, Alchemy have been there first.
My agenda, is only to prove a point that, it isn't that much safer than PNaCL, and the only thing we got from its adoption is a 10 year delay having a general purpose VM in the browser.
Ironically, Chrome is anyway who calls the shots in WebAssembly, as per browser market share.
Re:QuakeJS – A Quake Port to JavaScript with Emscripten
by BubRoss on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @09:32AM
(#22803019)
You think all the people in this thread talking about quake 3 and doom 3 running smoothly are part of an agenda against ancient bytecode formats for IBM mainframes?
Those people are the ones with an agenda to spread WebAssembly as above anything else in regards to safety, and the very first attempt to have a bytecode format for C and C++ code, when IBM and Unisys mainframes, CLR, Brew, Tendra, PNaCL, Alchemy have been there first.
My agenda, is only to prove a point that, it isn't that much safer than PNaCL, and the only thing we got from its adoption is a 10 year delay having a general purpose VM in the browser.
Ironically, Chrome is anyway who calls the shots in WebAssembly, as per browser market share.