News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume by arbitraryacct on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @04:47AM (#22801463)
Arbitration is extremely disruptive. If someone takes you to arbitration, you pay $1k non-refundable, simply because they want to take you to court.

If you do end up in court, it's another $20k just for JAMS fees. Again, non-refundable, doesn't matter if you win or lose.

So if someone is trying to take you to arbitration over less than $20k, it really doesn't matter AT ALL if they are right or not, it makes sense to settle for whatever amount you can convince them to agree to.

You can kill a company with frivolous arbitrations, just by having enough people willing to file one. Doesn't matter if those people have been wronged.

Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume by TheCoelacanth on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @10:38AM (#22803588)
Should have thought of that before you added a mandatory arbitration clause to your contracts.
Re:A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume by jeltz on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @08:09AM (#22802440)
If so, why not just remove the arbitration clause?