This is a huge win for Zoom on a marketing front.
Most video chat apps are straightforward once set up on the phone.
People then look at the articles written in the media and say "hey i use that app too, cool, we are part of the same tribe".
Showing of knowledge of the tech-zeitgeist is an easy way for a politician or anyone for that matter to appear being both with the times", "tech-savvy" and just the same as regular folk.
It implies speed, and thus implies power.
Since you zoom in on things to see them better it implies attention to detail.
The productivity of the prime minister is in no way hampered, people, he Zooms!
on far too many lenses I've owned it's simply not true
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom_Video_Communications
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Yuan
[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-apple-icloud-insigh...
If Zoom is “Chinese tech” because of the CEO’s ethnicity, then I suppose NVIDIA and AMD are now “Chinese tech.”
I would expect a more stringent approach to something used by a government to actually conduct "governing", and in the time of crisis at that!
https://jobs.amd.com/search/?createNewAlert=false&q=&locatio...
The Nvidia WeWork link might not work but you can look for job postings and filter for China yourself.
Look for yourself how many postings they have for software and hardware positions in China.
Does anyone else find it really weird? Late-night TV hosts, I can understand - maybe they just get paid for it, or have Zoom shares. But for example UK government leaders repeatedly mentioning it by name, e.g. Matt Hancock saying that despite being unwell, Boris Johnson is still having "Zoom videoconferences", or saying Johnson addressed his "Zoom cabinet", just feels... weird.
Edited to add: thinking about it more, I remember "FaceTime" being used pretty similarly when it was new. So I guess all the bad news is just sensitising me.